Reading the fine print, circling the suspicious bits...
Reading the fine print, circling the suspicious bits...
How evidence-support assessments are built from source-bound records, independent owner judgments, and deterministic rubric code.
Step 1
Fetch
Paste an allowlisted paper URL or upload a PDF. The source adapter creates one canonical identity, normalized document, page ledger, and deterministic structural pre-scan before model work begins.
Step 2
Classify
A structural classifier resolves a paper type from source-bound records. If the proposal is missing, ambiguous, invalid, or weakly supported, the closed fallback path is selected deterministically.
Step 3
Extract
Four independent model lanes produce typed records for claims, evidence, methodology, and paper context. Quotes and references must resolve to the normalized source ledger; model prose is never treated as an assessment result.
Step 4
Assess
Four owner lanes judge claim alignment, evidence quality, methodology, and rhetorical restraint. Each owner returns closed findings, confidence, and source references that are validated independently.
Step 5
Score
Deterministic rubric code aggregates criteria into dimensions, applies explicit caps and minimum-evidence rules, derives confidence and verdict, and renders closed rationale text.
The model supplies typed, source-bound findings. The deterministic assembler owns the public assessment result.
Source-bound inputs
canonical source identity + normalized text + page records
typed claims, evidence, methodology, and rhetoric findings
resolved references + closed confidence tokens
Deterministic assembly
owner findings → criteria → dimensions → overall score
minimum-evidence rules and explicit caps apply in fixed order
verdict, confidence, and rationale are derived once
Public response
ready: complete assessment or explicit insufficient evidence
unavailable: no partial assessment payload
all fields pass the same strict serializer at every boundary
Each dimension is assembled from its named criteria and preserves its applicability, evidence references, confidence, and rationale.
Claim alignment and evidence nature: criteria and owner evidence are aggregated under claim_alignment
Category evidence quality: criteria and owner evidence are aggregated under evidence_quality
Methodology and transparency: criteria and owner evidence are aggregated under methodology
Rhetorical restraint and overstatement: criteria and owner evidence are aggregated under rhetoric
Owner lanes
claim_alignment_and_evidence_naturecategory_evidence_qualitymethodology_and_transparencyrhetoric_restraint_and_overstatementAssessment dimensions
claim_alignmentevidence_qualitymethodologyrhetoricA dimension may be scored, not applicable, or not assessable, depending on paper type and usable evidence.
Explicit caps
critical_assessment_failureminimum_evidencelow_confidenceunresolved_evidenceSource-bound. Quotes, structural signals, and references are checked against one normalized source ledger.
Separated responsibilities. Model producers return typed findings; deterministic code owns IDs, aggregation, caps, confidence, verdicts, and rationale.
Fail closed. Invalid model output, unresolved references, insufficient evidence, malformed state, and persistence failures map to explicit stable states.
Validated everywhere. The same strict union is validated before HTTP return, cache replay, persistence, SSE completion, and frontend rendering.
Privacy-aware. Structured events contain operational metadata only; source content, prompts, provider responses, and credentials never belong in logs.
Read the result as a transparent evidence-support assessment, not a certification of research quality. See the monitored operational contract in docs/monitoring.md.
See also /about.